G.E.M. Anscombe (1919-2001) was once the most very important, outspoken, and misunderstood philosophers of the 20 th century. greater than somebody else she revived advantage ethics and the philosophy of motion. She was once additionally nearly by myself in publicly opposing Oxford University's selection to award an honorary measure to President Truman. She appeared his choice to authorize bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki as murderous. a few liberals appreciate her for this stand, yet conservatives additionally appreciate her for her competition to abortion, birth control, and same-sex marriage. sincerely her values weren't these of her instances. This led her to mirror at the changes, generating such works as sleek ethical Philosophy, within which she rejected all glossy theories of ethics. during this paper she cash the time period 'consequentialism' to explain the dominant view, which she rejects, that what issues morally is the result of what one does. positioned crudely, the ends can justify the capability. If sufficient lives may be stored through focusing on civilians, then civilians might be designated. by contrast, Anscombe insisted that yes activities are forbidden, which triggered her curiosity within the nature of motion and its relation to a person's personality. no matter if one has the same opinion together with her or now not, those are all matters that remain appropriate and on which Anscombe's perspectives are continually powerful and intelligently defended. Her presentation of those perspectives, regrettably, is frequently dense, and they're frequently badly misunderstood even via a few very capable minds. Anscombe's ethical Philosophy clarifies what Anscombe considered ethics, displaying how her various principles attach and the way she supported them. It additionally evaluates her reasoning, exhibiting that it truly is better in a few components than in others. The 5 major chapters of the booklet deal in flip along with her paintings on army ethics (including the so-called doctrine of double effect), her rejection of consequentialism, her assault at the sleek, atheist idea of ethical legal responsibility, her research of goal and its relevance for ethics, and her debatable principles approximately sex.